A majority of New Jersey voters would support banning artificial intelligence data centers in their communities, according to a May 5 poll released by the William J. Hughes Center for Public Policy at Stockton University.
The findings reflect widespread concern about the rapid growth of AI and its impact on jobs, electricity costs, and the environment. According to the poll, 56% of voters said they would back a ban on data centers in their towns, while only 22% would oppose such measures and 21% were unsure.
The survey found that nearly three-quarters (74%) of respondents believe AI will eliminate more jobs than it creates. Just 7% think it will create more jobs than it eliminates, and another 13% expect little or no impact either way. A plurality (41%) believe increased use of AI will make their lives worse—up from 36% in a similar Stockton poll conducted in 2024—while only about one-fourth (27%) think it will improve their lives.
Public skepticism extends to the perceived benefits of data centers themselves: just 8% see them as beneficial to local communities, compared with nearly half (49%) who say they do more harm than good. Concerns over energy use are high as well; most voters reported being very or somewhat concerned about both electricity costs and environmental impacts linked to these facilities.
Assistant director Alyssa Maurice said, “New Jersey is home to many energy-intensive industries, from pharmaceuticals to advanced manufacturing to technology, and the growth of data centers anywhere in the region will only add to existing demand pressures.” Maurice also commented on policy challenges ahead: “The policy debate around data centers is just beginning, as questions remain over appropriate zoning, how energy is sourced, and who pays for much-needed grid upgrades. At the same time, New Jersey leaders are sure to face continued pressure to reduce energy costs for residents.”
When asked about regulatory approaches for new developments like these facilities—which have drawn public pushback including local bans—84% favored requiring them to supply their own power rather than rely on existing grids. More than eight in ten supported stricter environmental standards; meanwhile almost three-fourths opposed offering tax breaks or subsidies for attracting such projects.
Accordingly, opinions diverged regarding overall state strategy: while a plurality favored encouraging development but with strict regulations on energy usage and environmental impacts (46%), more than one-third preferred discouraging new projects altogether (35%). Only a small minority supported looser rules aimed at promoting economic growth through tech infrastructure expansion (12%).
The Stockton Polling Institute conducted this survey among 642 registered New Jersey voters between April 21-27 using telephone and online interviews.
